Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Jul 2000 14:01:42 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Cc:        "David G. Andersen" <dga@POBOX.COM>, security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Two kinds of advisories? 
Message-ID:  <200007132001.OAA26673@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:26:06 MDT." <4.3.2.7.2.20000713122244.00b06410@localhost> 
References:  <4.3.2.7.2.20000713122244.00b06410@localhost>  <4.3.2.7.2.20000713120631.04d53b60@localhost> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <4.3.2.7.2.20000713122244.00b06410@localhost> Brett Glass writes:
: Many of them don't read the disclaimers because they're scanning the
: subject lines. When they see one with "FreeBSD" in it, some of them
: call in a panic. They often don't read the message because they
: believe that they won't understand it.
: 
: Yes, I know, it'd be nice if they weren't so clueless about computer
: security and FreeBSD, but then, they're experts in their own fields,
: which WE don't know much about. Instead of writing them off, why
: not make the subject lines clearer?

At present, I think the subject lines are just fine.  However, I'm
always open to positive suggestions about how, specifically, to change 
them.  Until such time as I see a good, specific suggestion, they will 
remain the way they are.  I gave the matter a lot of thought when it
was suggested, and this seemed to be the best way to deal with it.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007132001.OAA26673>