Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 11:40:29 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: mono@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194660] lang/mono Add mono/metadata/mono-route.c for non-Linux ParseRouteInfo_local Message-ID: <bug-194660-23699-v01YFjLKOc@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-194660-23699@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-194660-23699@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D194660 --- Comment #15 from Romain Tarti=C3=A8re <romain@FreeBSD.org> --- A Makefile.am file is only in the source repository because it is used by t= he autotools to generate the corresponding Makefile.in file, which in turn is = used at the ./configure stage to generate the final Makefile. Usualy, a repository will therefore only contain a Makefile.am, but release tarballs will include both the Makefile.am and the generated Makefile.in fi= les (to avoid users to have all the autotools chain installed. The Makefile.am file is not useful for final users unless they want to regenerate a new Makefile.in). So, as far as the ports tree is concerned, only the changes to the Makefile= .in are relevant for a patch (but changes for the corresponding Makefile.am do = not hurt), and for upstream, only the changes to Makefile.am are relevant. This new patch is better shaped than the previous one, I am giving it a try= at the moment. Thank you for your work on this! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-194660-23699-v01YFjLKOc>