Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 11:40:29 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: mono@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194660] lang/mono Add mono/metadata/mono-route.c for non-Linux ParseRouteInfo_local Message-ID: <bug-194660-23699-v01YFjLKOc@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-194660-23699@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194660 --- Comment #15 from Romain Tartière <romain@FreeBSD.org> --- A Makefile.am file is only in the source repository because it is used by the autotools to generate the corresponding Makefile.in file, which in turn is used at the ./configure stage to generate the final Makefile. Usualy, a repository will therefore only contain a Makefile.am, but release tarballs will include both the Makefile.am and the generated Makefile.in files (to avoid users to have all the autotools chain installed. The Makefile.am file is not useful for final users unless they want to regenerate a new Makefile.in). So, as far as the ports tree is concerned, only the changes to the Makefile.in are relevant for a patch (but changes for the corresponding Makefile.am do not hurt), and for upstream, only the changes to Makefile.am are relevant. This new patch is better shaped than the previous one, I am giving it a try at the moment. Thank you for your work on this! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-194660-23699-v01YFjLKOc>