Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 23:41:47 +0300 From: Artyom Mirgorodskiy <artyom.mirgorodsky@gmail.com> To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> Subject: Re: Linux Skype 4.0.0.8 on FreeBSD is works! Message-ID: <1695305.7rabUc52kj@notebook.alkar.net> In-Reply-To: <20130613195356.GB911@tiny.Sisis.de> References: <5601141.3vH9Oc8Bjl@notebook.alkar.net> <51BA20F1.3090102@rawbw.com> <20130613195356.GB911@tiny.Sisis.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Forgot to say, I'm using replacement libraries instead install linux_base-c6 for compatibility with linux-f10-flashplugin. On Thursday 13 June 2013 21:53:57 Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Thursday, June 13, 2013 a las 12:43:45PM -0700, Yuri escribió: > > > On 06/13/2013 12:14, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote: > > > I would like to share my experience of running Skype 4.0.0.8. > > > > Is it any better in your opinion? > > I saw 4.1.0.20 in Linux and functionally it is all the same, except > > "Away" status is gone. I don't like it because it only takes away > > flexibility without adding value. > > I'm facing the problem that video stops working in Sk calls between > skype-2.1.0.81_1,1 (from the actual ports) and Windows Skype versions of > 6.x; the call establishes fine, audio is fine but the video is > dropped/rejected; this is not a local problem because video works fine > between skype-2.1.0.81_1,1 and skype-2.1.0.81_1,1; it looks more that > there are changes in the protocol or codecs or whatever; for this a > working 4.x (congratulations!!!) could be a step to get it working > again; > > > Maybe it is a good idea to create a new net-im/skype4 instead of pushing > > everybody to 4.X ? > > net-im/skype4 would be really nice > > matthias > > -- Artyom Mirgorodskiy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1695305.7rabUc52kj>