Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:48:24 -0600 (MDT) From: "Ryan Sommers" <ryans@gamersimpact.com> To: "John Baldwin" <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca> Subject: Re: 5.3: /stand/ versus /rescue/ ? Message-ID: <50044.208.4.77.15.1097084904.squirrel@208.4.77.15> In-Reply-To: <200410051249.37820.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <20041003124353.29822.qmail@web54005.mail.yahoo.com> <16738.45007.276964.761754@canoe.dclg.ca> <200410051738.32415.freebsd@redesjm.local> <200410051249.37820.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> /stand is installed as part of the installation process. Basically, > sysinstall starts off by letting you partition your disks. Once that is > done, it mounts everything under /mnt, then copies the /stand off of the > mfsroot to /mnt/stand and finally chroots into mnt for the rest of the > install. It copies /stand so that it can still get to the utilities > in /stand that it needs while it does the actual install. Is there any reason why we need /stand after the install process? As part of the post-install configuration would it be possible to have /stand removed? -- Ryan Sommers ryans@gamersimpact.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50044.208.4.77.15.1097084904.squirrel>