Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:03:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206220903190.26684@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <4FE41288.5020404@gmail.com> References: <201206201015.q5KAFKKj026496@mail.r-bonomi.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201353500.24316@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20120620171112.GB23095@hemlock.hydra> <4FE41288.5020404@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> underway to make sure the base system will compile cleanly with both >> Clang and GCC 4.2+, so I think you're just making up complaints here. >> Someone (other than Wojciech Puchar, who would just be talking out of his once again personal attacks from unhappy childs. >> ass) correct me if I'm mistaken. > reported by gcc46 warning > > Approved by: cperciva (implicit) > > So at least there are some people working on polishing CURRENT/STABLE up to > the point it will build with gcc46. > sounds good.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206220903190.26684>