Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 03 Dec 1997 01:45:25 -0800
From:      "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
To:        Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Cc:        Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, FreeBSD current users <FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: 3.0 -release ? 
Message-ID:  <6959.881142325@time.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 Dec 1997 22:53:47 PST." <199712030653.WAA01384@rah.star-gate.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Cool, ISPs will not run SMP for a very , very long time!
> 
> 	Great!!!

I'm never sure when Amancio's being sarcastic or not on account of the
fact that he always talks this way but, just in case he was, let me
simply say that ISPs steering clear of SMP right now is actually A
Good Thing.  Before we're ready to start telling customers that it's a
good, cost-effective idea to purchase and operate x86/SMP systems, we
need to be sure of several things:

	o That there are compelling performance reasons for
	  running "typical" applications (those being web servers,
	  interactive users, news servers, whatever) on SMP
	  configurations, and at which number of CPUs this becomes
	  most (and least) cost-effective.

	o That the SMP design and implementation has stabilized to
	  the point where no unforseen traumas are likely to occur
	  during the customer's tracking of the 3.0 branch (which
	  we must, as usual, encourage).

	o That appropriate developer's interfaces exist for taking
	  specific advantage of SMP, be it by way of kernel threads,
	  mutexes or whatever mechanisms are generally the rage among
	  SMP applications developers that week.  We cannot forget
	  the people who will be in the "first wave" of trying to
	  make various real-world problems work faster since they'll
	  be our staunchest advocates (or loudest detractors) if we
	  don't provide them with all the necessary support for
	  making SMP (and FreeBSD in general) look like a wise
	  decision to their employer(s).

In other words, let's get psyched about SMP and keep helping the likes
of Steve Passe to test and improve our SMP support, but let's not jump
the gun and try to "sell" this as something to be used for actual
production purposes before all the proper pieces are in place and we
can recommend it with real confidence in our numbers, our stability
and our feature set.  Getting to that stage is going to take the time
it takes, and I don't predict rapid so much as steady progress on that
project.

And even so, for those final remaining ISPs who are in the "I don't
care how dangerous it is, just let me try it for myself!" category
(you know, the same ones who occasionally parachute to work and land
in the parking lot or free climb the side of the building to their 8th
floor offices, just to stay in practice), we have 3.0-current and the
current.freebsd.org snapshot server just waiting to deliver the latest
bits in a convenient selection of formats.

To put it another way, if you want the release du-jour then you've got
it, ready to install or upgrade you to very the latest bits.  If you
want one with 6 months worth of refinement and testing put into it,
you wait 6 months.  It's darn simple, really! :-)

					Jordan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6959.881142325>