Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 06:35:08 +0000 From: "Tobias Kortkamp" <tobik@FreeBSD.org> To: "Kyle Evans" <kevans@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports failing with -fno-common with clang 9/gcc 9 Message-ID: <27f5739b-6bce-4b1c-8ca2-5b79e783b67d@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CACNAnaHAo6jFpRu3j0rB19oK7WrSvafRqiMOvy7JdWa7uvB2wg@mail.gmail.com> References: <fd56ab9b-82f2-3022-2773-47767afa39c3@heuristicsystems.com.au> <CACNAnaHAo6jFpRu3j0rB19oK7WrSvafRqiMOvy7JdWa7uvB2wg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020, at 14:56, Kyle Evans wrote: > In any event, I would urge folks to be proactive and identify this > stuff, reporting issues upstream and spreading awareness of the > impending default change for those projects that may not already be > actively aware. > > On a closing note, I'm just going to kinda drop these patches here for > anyone that's willing/able to help make this a collective effort to > identify/fix/report problems here; they backport the default > -fno-common patch from future-LLVM11 to the base system compiler on a > system near you: > > HEAD: https://people.freebsd.org/~kevans/llvm-fnocommon-head.diff Can you ask for an exp-run with this patch applied? There needs to be a comprehensive list of failing ports for people to be able to work on this. We see some failing ports because of default -fno-common in GCC 10 [1] already. [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246700
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?27f5739b-6bce-4b1c-8ca2-5b79e783b67d>