Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 20:45:08 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Rick Macklem <rick.macklem@gmail.com> Cc: src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, dev-commits-doc-all@freebsd.org, doc-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 481fce462d - main - Document various missing __FreeBSD_version values. Message-ID: <987ad115-9c14-4f5e-8e1d-ef69f84afd9e@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAM5tNy7OiEXL6F%2BFyGA7rdwHsimLiATLmUWW=Hnb_n2y0EQK-A@mail.gmail.com> References: <69447e71.46420.2787bc4a@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <f94be1b6-5441-4930-95f7-c5546664f144@FreeBSD.org> <CAM5tNy7OiEXL6F%2BFyGA7rdwHsimLiATLmUWW=Hnb_n2y0EQK-A@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 12/18/25 17:53, Rick Macklem wrote: > I'm guilty. But someone said that it should only be bumped > if no one else has bumped it recently. (Within a few days?) > > If it isn't getting bumped for every change, the document > is basically useless, isn't it? The main reason it is documented in the porter's handbook is so that if ports need to use conditional logic, this is a reference to which versions to use. Ports doesn't need perfect granularity (especially on main), just something that is "close", hence why bumping more often than, say, once a day is probably overkill. -- John Baldwinhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?987ad115-9c14-4f5e-8e1d-ef69f84afd9e>