Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:52:31 +0100 (CET) From: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.gmd.de> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.gmd.de>, David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>, <cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG>, <cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include unistd.h src/lib/libc/sys brk.2 src/libexec/rtld-aout rtld.c src/libexec/rtld-elf malloc.c Message-ID: <20020124174908.G361-100000@beagle.fokus.gmd.de> In-Reply-To: <20020124184624.B74534@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: RE>On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 02:49:21PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote: RE>> On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, David Malone wrote: RE>> RE>> DM>> Cool, thanks! RE>> DM> RE>> DM>Bruch pointed out that we still have a small problem with the man RE>> DM>page. Both brk and sbrk are now library functions, but their man RE>> DM>page is still in section 2. RE>> RE>> sbrk is a library function, that is based on SYS_break. SYS_break is a RE>> system call, implemented in vm_unix.c (obreak()). So we would have to RE>> split the man page between sections 2 and 3. RE>> RE>> We should probably also add a .St -susv2 in the man page, now that we are RE>> conform to the standard. RE>> RE>Neither sbrk() nor brk() are part of the POSIX.1-2001. but of the Single Unix Specification, Version 2 which -susv2 refers to: http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7908799/xsh/brk.html POSIX.1-2001 is SUSv3 harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.gmd.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private brandt@fokus.fhg.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020124174908.G361-100000>