Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 01 Jun 2001 22:23:59 +0000
From:      Kevin Lo <kevlo@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/java/linux-jdk13 Makefile distinfo   pkg-plistports/java/linux-jdk13/files patch-aa patch-ab  patch-ac 
Message-ID:  <3B1815FF.89FCB27F@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <Pine.LNX.4.21.0106012156260.30033-100000@colo.toptk.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Maxim Sobolev wrote:

> Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> >
> > > Kevin Lo wrote:
> > >
> > > > Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > sobomax     2001/06/01 01:18:53 PDT
> > > > >
> > > > >   Modified files:
> > > > >     java/linux-jdk13     Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
> > > > >     java/linux-jdk13/files patch-aa patch-ab patch-ac
> > > > >   Log:
> > > > >   Undo upgrade to 1.3.1. Unfortunately committer who committed change did not
> > > > >   notice PR submitter's follow-up in which he asked not to do upgrade due to
> > > > >   the bug discovered in this particular version of JDK.
> > > >
> > > > *sigh* Where the bugs are ? Are you the maintainer ?
> > >
> > > I only did what original author of the PR asked for.
> >
> > If the submitter is wrong, should I be wrong, too?
> > If the submitter said that the foo port has bugs, you can fix them
> > even though you're not the maintainer?
> > Ok, let me ask you a simple question:
> >
> > HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT THE SUBMITTER IS RIGHT IN THIS CASE???
> >
> > Did you find any bug? Did you test it?
> >
> > Obviously, you didn't.
> > As you said, you only did what original author of the PR asked for.
> > Very good reason, isn't it?
>
> I'm just trying to be at the safe side. I have no reasons to not trust him. If he is
> wrong we could do upgrade later - not a big deal.

Ok. Well, I just wondering why you didn't trust me? reason?

> > > > As I told you via private email, please back it out and add the MESSAGE:
> > > >
> > > > This binary linux release of the Sun JDK may be
> > > > subject to serveral security vulnerabilities that we cannot
> > > > correct. More information on those as well as other known
> > > > Java vulnerabilities can be found at:
> > > > http://java.sun.com/sfaq/chronology.html
> > >
> > > I'm still not convinced that it is the Right Way [tm] to go. What makes this
> > > upgrade so important that we need to tolerate known securities flaws in it?
> >
> > Did you go to that url and see what bugs for 1.3.1???
> > AGAIN, you didn't!! Please back it out!!!!!
> > Should I tell you one more time??
>
> Please cool-off and let us back to this issue later.

I was cool. So what you want to do next step?
I just want to know what the *significant bugs* that
you use 1.3.0_2 instead of 1.3.1?
If you can't find that bug, please do me a favor,  back it out, OK?

> -Maxim

- Kevin


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B1815FF.89FCB27F>