Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:34:25 +0000 (UTC) From: Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> To: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: svn commit: r215798 - head/share/man/man9 Message-ID: <201011241234.oAOCYPqY070302@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Author: kib Date: Wed Nov 24 12:34:25 2010 New Revision: 215798 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/215798 Log: Remove the note about possible unlocking during vunref(9). It might only happen if VOP_INACTIVATE() drops the vnode lock, which is quite unreasonable behaviour for filesystem, and should not be mentioned in the description of VFS primitives. MFC after: 1 week Modified: head/share/man/man9/vrele.9 Modified: head/share/man/man9/vrele.9 ============================================================================== --- head/share/man/man9/vrele.9 Wed Nov 24 12:30:41 2010 (r215797) +++ head/share/man/man9/vrele.9 Wed Nov 24 12:34:25 2010 (r215798) @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ .\" .\" $FreeBSD$ .\" -.Dd October 17, 2010 +.Dd November 20, 2010 .Dt VRELE 9 .Os .Sh NAME @@ -74,10 +74,6 @@ with less overhead. The .Fn vunref function takes a locked vnode as argument, and returns with the vnode locked. -Nonetheless, the -.Fn vunref -might drop the vnode lock during the operation, so caller should not expect -that non-doomed vnode is still non-doomed after the function returned. .Pp Any code in the system which signified its use of a vnode by usecount should call one of the listed function to decrement use counter.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201011241234.oAOCYPqY070302>