Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2000 23:12:01 -0500 (EST) From: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: reg@FreeBSD.org Subject: Issues with plugins Message-ID: <XFMail.000108231201.andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-ports, Recently, it seems a deluge of programs have various "plugins" that add (or, in some cases, provide the) functionality to the program. Examples would include Apache (although that's been around for ages), KMySQL (which both myself and Chris D. Faulhaber have been trying to port), and Gecco (which I just noticed on Freshmeat), plus a gazillion others I've not thought of. What I'd like to try to do with this (potential) thread is to deliberate a general way of accomodating programs that run plugins. Ideas include: o Having one port that covers the primary program, and having separate ports for each plugin. o Having a dialog/configure script that allows easy selecting from plugins I would really prefer some easier method. I have heard that Jeremy Lea (reg@FreeBSD.org) is writing an OPTIONAL_DEPENDS or something similar for the purpose of allowing people to decide to use X, Y, or Z with a certain port. Is this true? -- Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.000108231201.andrews>