Date: 05 Mar 2002 13:30:18 -0800 From: swear@blarg.net (Gary W. Swearingen) To: anderson@centtech.com Cc: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>, Murray Stokely <murray@freebsdmall.com>, Nik Clayton <nik@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new FreeBSD mailing list Message-ID: <tmadtmhfdh.dtm@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <3C84C9EE.71635BF8@centtech.com> References: <3C7AFCED.ADDE60EE@centtech.com> <20020226093250.A1369@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <3C7BEF25.C1EEB8AD@centtech.com> <20020304215226.GG3250@freebsdmall.com> <p05101504b8aa468a2ac4@[10.0.1.3]> <3C84C9EE.71635BF8@centtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> writes: > That's pretty much my goal. I'd like to discuss with others who are using > FreeBSD in different contexts, and gather the pertinent tuning information. > Having it in the Handbook is fantastic, but individually we are not able to see > all areas of tuning, or even all the effects of some tuning. I would hate to > tune my FreeBSD box for NFS serving, and have it hose the http servicing (for > example), and publish it. Kind of a "peer review" effect. That all makes sense, but I wonder if you could get much of the same benefit and a larger readership (important, methinks) if there was a ML for "the discussion of documentation improvements" which could have long-lived "tuning" (and other) threads. I've seen a need for such ML when -doc didn't seem the place and the other MLs were either too unfamiliar to me or too-little read or seemingly inappropriate. This could reduce the amount of errors introduced by the two or three (usually non-specialist) people involved with a PR but not caught by lurking specialists. I have previously feared that such a list would have a too-small readership, but now I don't see why it should be any smaller than -perf or such; i.e., not too small to be worth a try. I would hope that it would draw a lot of "do-gooders" that are otherwise not willing to get involved in particular PRs. Another time killer. In lieu of either your or my suggested ML, -hackers seems the best ML for you and me (though I've not yet tried posting there, so I could be very wrong). Is -hackers good enough? Is it even OK? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?tmadtmhfdh.dtm>