Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 22:48:05 -0500 From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@asme.org> To: Roelof Osinga <roelof@nisser.com> Cc: Gustavo V G C Rios <kernel@lince.tdnet.com.br>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ? Message-ID: <38EEABF5.9F05176@asme.org> References: <38ED128C.22C3AA28@tdnet.com.br> <20000406192206.N22104@fw.wintelcom.net> <38ED233E.74716D02@tdnet.com.br> <20000406230234.B4381@fw.wintelcom.net> <38EDD209.421EF9B0@tdnet.com.br> <38EE0536.F2305A40@quack.kfu.com> <38EDDBC4.51F2414D@tdnet.com.br> <38EE49A9.FD59F18@asme.org> <38EE6578.B27A1B27@nisser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Roelof Osinga wrote:
>
...
>
> Take Apple for one. FreeBSD over a microkernel. Maybe one of these
> years we'll see a release Hurd too <g>.
>
Of course the first effort on this was BSD lites...I wonder what the
hurd is going to do know...Apple got there first.
Anyway, I read somewhere that many Apple engineers were happier with a
monolitic kernel, (specificly FreeBSD) but the higher levels simply
wanted Mach. We will be able to make nice comparisons when we have a
FreeBSD port for the PowerPC...
cheers,
Pedro.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38EEABF5.9F05176>