Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 11:58:52 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 Message-ID: <20020621085852.GI42492@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <3D0CD6F2.86EB2958@FreeBSD.org> References: <200206161424.g5GEOqo76198@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020616105041.D23689@xor.obsecurity.org> <3D0CD6F2.86EB2958@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 11:20:34AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 07:24:52AM -0700, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > sobomax 2002/06/16 07:24:52 PDT > > > > > > Modified files: > > > . Makefile.inc1 > > > Log: > > > Don't try to build libssh if NO_OPENSSL is defined because NO_OPENSSL implies > > > NO_OPENSSH. > > > > Historically we've required that people set both, i.e. they're not > > covering locks. If you want to make them into covering locks then > > you'll have a lot more work on your hands, because this change is not > > complete. > > Also, people might have their own version of openssl lying around for > ssh to link with. > Just speaking in theory? Most SSH bits were not built in the NO_OPENSSL case, this change just brought more (but incomplete) consistency. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9EurMUkv4P6juNwoRAtApAJ0TWhL/trIQUNVjXBLRU1kkJjYIPACfeqsL 7i4H8KzbG8h/QA4RbdT56SI= =2hqK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020621085852.GI42492>