Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 20:36:07 +0400 From: Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru> To: Richard Coleman <rcoleman@criticalmagic.com> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Public Access to Perforce? Message-ID: <41238577.8070701@cronyx.ru> In-Reply-To: <412380F2.3040707@criticalmagic.com> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040818115052.55952G-100000@fledge.watson.org> <412380F2.3040707@criticalmagic.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warning! current@ is doubled in cc, please remove one. Richard Coleman wrote: > Robert Watson wrote: > >> Last I looked, my primary concerns with Subversion were: >> >> - Cost to import full FreeBSD history. >> >> - That it promised the multi-way branching and merging in a future >> release, but did not yet have it. >> >> Do you know how things look with respect to the second issue? >> >> Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects >> robert@fledge.watson.org Principal Research Scientist, McAfee >> Research > > > Reading the ChangeLog for the upcoming subversion-1.1 release, it > doesn't look like it. > > http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/CHANGES > > My understanding is that the merge functionality in subversion is > still about the same that is currently in CVS (although faster). > > But there's no denying that subversion is getting better by the day. > For a new project, I wouldn't hesitate to suggest subversion. But for > a large, existing project like *BSD there doesn't seem to be a > compelling reason to switch (yet). But that will change eventually. > > Richard Coleman > rcoleman@criticalmagic.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41238577.8070701>