Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:08:22 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> Cc: davidxu@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fix for libpthread Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10403030904040.17237-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20040303061144.GE56622@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > This assertion doesn't seem necessary. Apply to > src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_spinlock.c No, it's not necessary, but the only consumers of spinlocks are libc and we don't want libc calling locking functions when we're not threaded. It was an anti-foot-shooting thing I believe. -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10403030904040.17237-100000>