Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 15:18:27 +0100 (MET) From: Bruno Haible <haible@ilog.fr> To: Thomas Sparrevohn <staff@kyklopen.ping.dk> Cc: bug-g++@prep.ai.mit.edu, Nate Williams <nate@sri.mt.net>, Josh MacDonald <jmacd@cs.berkeley.edu>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: internal compiler error Message-ID: <199703031418.PAA27039@halles.ilog.fr>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
Hi there,
Thank you for your GNU g++ bug report from 17 May 1996. The current g++
release, g++ 2.7.2, compiles your code snippet without errors, with
optimization settings ranging from -O0 to -O3.
Thank you again!
Bruno Haible
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 08:42:59 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Thomas Sparrevohn <staff@kyklopen.ping.dk>
To: Nate Williams <nate@sri.mt.net>
Cc: Josh MacDonald <jmacd@cs.berkeley.edu>, bug-g++@prep.ai.mit.edu,
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: internal compiler error
In-Reply-To: <199605161430.IAA22882@rocky.sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960517083854.3405A-100000@kyklopen>
On Thu, 16 May 1996, Nate Williams wrote:
>
> Hmm, it works fine under -stable with 2.6.3.
>
But unfortunately our gcc gives an internal error when it compiles the
following program with "-O" and "-O2" but not "-O3" and with out
optimizations:
/*
* Compilation of the following program with gcc -O (v2.6.3 on FreeBSD 2.1.0)
* and (v2.6.3 current) yields:
*
* gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 10
*
*/
struct s1 { double x, y, z; };
struct s2 { double r, g, b; };
struct s3 {
struct s1 p;
struct s2 c;
};
void create_light(struct s3 *li,
double x, double y, double z,
double r, double g, double b)
{
li->p.x = x;
li->p.y = y;
li->p.z = z;
li->c.r = r;
li->c.g = g;
li->c.b = b;
}
> #cheap shot on#
> This is one of the reasons why we stick w/older versions of GCC. :)
> #cheap shot off#
>
>
> Nate
>
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703031418.PAA27039>