Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:46:49 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: me@privacy.net Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question on quieting kernel boot Message-ID: <20040115064649.GG59417@starjuice.net> In-Reply-To: <BAY1-F112AaWZ3DWh2400013cf0@hotmail.com> References: <BAY1-F112AaWZ3DWh2400013cf0@hotmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On (2004/01/14 17:17), Rob MacGregor wrote: > Looks like both options are extremes of what I'm after. I'm really looking > for a quiet option, to cut out the cruft. However, as there is a verbose > boot option that might give me a starting point for a quieter boot option. I think the problem is that one person's cruft is another person's useful info. The general solution to the problem you've pointed out is facility/priority logging, a'la syslog. A kernel implementation probably represents a lot of work. Ciao, Sheldon.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040115064649.GG59417>