Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 6 Jun 1997 00:35:23 +0100 (BST)
From:      Manar Hussain <manar@ivision.co.uk>
To:        "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
Cc:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ETinc's Bandwidth limiter
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.3.93.970606003248.26623D-100000@stingray.ivision.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <3396FBEF.35C1@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>This can be done, consult with Ethinc, they have FreeBSD hackers and the
>last time I saw they were even re-selling FreeBSD.

If "Ethinc" = my ETinc = www.etinc.com then I am well aware that "this can
be done" - my question was in fact has anyone done it with this approach
and if so what were there positive/negative experiences. 

>Manar Hussain wrote:
>> 
>> >> Anyone got much experience of using this? We're thinking of using it to
>> >> maintain levels of service for a web farm: 1Mb pipe out to the net shared
>> >> across a set of machine on 100Mb ethernet (they talk to eachother as well).
>> >
>> >It looks like what you want (bw management, or probably better,
>> >fair routing) should be done at the router, not at the server side.
>> >So what are you using to drive your pipe out ?
>> 
>> Looks like I've not explained myself too well: the idea is to use a FreeBSD
>> box as a gateway (maybe even the router).
>> 
>> i.e.:             outside world
>>                         |
>>                    FreeBSD box
>>                         |
>>                 |---------------|  <-- network with web servers on them

Manar





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.93.970606003248.26623D-100000>