Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:04:59 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de> To: David Naylor <naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "tinderbox" using stacked unionfs Message-ID: <20100126140459.61e3951d@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <201001252039.16220.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> References: <201001231233.18832.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> <201001252039.16220.naylor.b.david@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:39:11 +0200 David Naylor <naylor.b.david@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday 23 January 2010 12:33:14 David Naylor wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have been experimenting with using unionfs to build ports in a > > "tinderbox" environment. This avoids having to remove and extract files > > for the build of each port and it allows the discovery of > > installed/modified files by the port. > > > > Please see attached for a (updated) shell script that handles all the > > "heavy lifting" of building ports. Of importance is LOCALBASE and > > BUILDDIR. If you want to override LOCALBASE please use `env` as the > > script needs to know about it. BUILDDIR (/usr/build by default) is where > > the script stores everything (including PKG_DBDIR). > > Please see attached for an updated script. This no longer uses `sort -u` but > removed duplicates while maintaining dependency order. (See below) > ENOSCRIPT --- Gary Jennejohn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100126140459.61e3951d>