Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 10:18:58 +0200 From: Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl> To: Patrick Reich <reichp@austin.rr.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which latex should I install Message-ID: <20090627081858.GA73349@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <1246082421.25793.11.camel@acheron.bluewinds.org> References: <20090626202632.68F1C10656B7@hub.freebsd.org> <1246082421.25793.11.camel@acheron.bluewinds.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 01:00:21AM -0500, Patrick Reich wrote: > One thing to add here is that the ports tree remains tied to > teTeX. If you install TexLive (either from DVD or Romain's) > and then install a port like texmacs, lyx, texmaker, or auctex > to edit your files, you'll pull in teTeX as a dependency. You > end up with both teTeX and TeXLive installed. If someone knows > how to avoid the duplicity, please do chime in - I'm not a fan > of having both. I require TeXLive for the mathematics typesetting > I do. What I do is change the Makefiles of the ports in question to remove the dependancies on teTeX. My way of doing that is creating a patch for the Makefile and re-applying that after each update of the ports tree. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkpF1fIACgkQEnfvsMMhpyUJagCZAT1cRHlTEf4Fj9It2TqULKVJ J/MAn2O22/IPWY3YLCHa7mexYTAHgJFQ =ZdSL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090627081858.GA73349>