Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 12:38:19 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227450] [patch] Should not all packets processed by gif_output be deleted, when an running instance of if_gif(4) is member of an instance of if_bridge(4)? Message-ID: <bug-227450-7501-okKrXSEdk7@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-227450-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-227450-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227450 --- Comment #9 from Zhenlei Huang <zlei@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Koichiro Iwao from comment #8) (In reply to Koichiro Iwao from comment #7) I managed to repeat this issue. This happens when a gif(8) interface is a member of if_bridge(4) , and still has IPv6 address assigned and try to send traffic from this IPv6 address. That is IMO harmless, since we can distinguish IP-IPv6, IPv6-IPv6 and Ether-IPv6 via the ip proto. So I think the asserting ( "unexpectedly called with bridge attached" ) is too strong. Well surely the implementation shoul= d be **fixed** to support that. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-227450-7501-okKrXSEdk7>