Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 21:37:16 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: clefevre@citeweb.net Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: malloc.h Message-ID: <200111080237.fA82bGO28786@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <200111080020.fA80Kpd99323@gits.dyndns.org> References: <200111072045.fA7KjLP70989@uriah.heep.sax.de> <200111080020.fA80Kpd99323@gits.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Thu, 8 Nov 2001 01:20:50 +0100 (CET), Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@citeweb.net> said: > Joerg Wunsch wrote: >> Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> wrote: >> >> > This is how we've decided to encourage progress in this specific >> > case of header misuse. >> >> IMHO the current version of <malloc.h> is wrong. This header >> file used to be a legitimate header file prior to ANSI C. So >> it should be >> >> #if __STDC__ > this statement is wrong. it should be > #ifdef __STDC__ > or > #if (__STDC__-0) == 0 No, it shouldn't. Leavinmg aside the correctness of the previous suggestion, anyone who explicitly defines __STDC__ to be the empty string should get what he deserves. In preprocessor expressions, any identifiers left after macro substitution are considered to have a value of zero. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200111080237.fA82bGO28786>