Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 15:30:24 -0700 (PDT) From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/56902: [patch] articles/fbsd-from-scratch: add/fix sgml tags Message-ID: <200309162230.h8GMUOFC022169@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/56902; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: Josef El-Rayes <j.el-rayes@daemon.li> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/56902: [patch] articles/fbsd-from-scratch: add/fix sgml tags Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 00:22:06 +0200 --da4uJneut+ArUgXk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2003.09.16 23:14:53 +0200, Josef El-Rayes wrote: > "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > I don't think X11 should be marked up as application, since it is not > > really an application, but rather the protocol/framework. Have you > > found any other places where it's marked up with the application tag? >=20 > for me it was in this association talking about X11 as an association, > but i looked at the handbook chapter about X and only XFree86 was marked > up as application so you are right here. >=20 > shall i redo this patch and pr 56903 to leave X11 with markup? I think that would be preferable. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen FreeBSD Documentation Team --da4uJneut+ArUgXk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/Z40Mh9pcDSc1mlERAifQAJ9zwnCLlTctbBaBeZuzt3kehF/+vACeKsKW L4yP7JMql9JSdl/t2QBGSy0= =2YVu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --da4uJneut+ArUgXk--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200309162230.h8GMUOFC022169>