Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 02:07:42 +0200 From: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de> To: James Raynard <fcurrent@jraynard.demon.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ktrace [Was: 2.2-960612-SNAP resolver problems] Message-ID: <199606190007.CAA01478@campa.panke.de> In-Reply-To: <199606170030.AAA10445@jraynard.demon.co.uk> References: <199606160211.MAA00203@godzilla.zeta.org.au> <199606170030.AAA10445@jraynard.demon.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
James Raynard writes: >Indeed. Apart from volume of output, is there any particular reason >why ktrace writes to a file which kdump reads in, as opposed to using >a pipe? Particularly as the first thing kdump does is >freopen(tracefile, "r", stdin)! Hm, try `ktrace -f /dev/stdout | kdump -f /dev/stdin' Wolfram
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606190007.CAA01478>