Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:40:28 +0100 From: "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@punkt.de> To: David Powers via freebsd-virtualization <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: The status of docker Message-ID: <FE466DD8-8FF9-43B4-8D5E-1AF8FEEE798F@punkt.de> In-Reply-To: <7A86028D-C413-4063-84D8-5AB985EAD2A0@kraus-haus.org> References: <089e330d-2761-2440-3b7f-dd22e9088af5@gjunka.com> <9A01020A-7CC6-4893-A425-11A7BF736F4E@ultra-secure.de> <42f59b63-fdc7-306f-d836-83533741a86c@FreeBSD.org> <CAG=rPVfTZnYc6%2BDjtk0SjkqijJQh6uA1G9VWEBsYy4aDYvYEgQ@mail.gmail.com> <CC0F6FB5-7939-4586-86DD-B5548E0043C3@punkt.de> <5c926314-adce-dba1-f5ce-2fda35e1aeba@gjunka.com> <FDDC8A58-8AD3-4D07-B0B3-0BDFA214ABA0@punkt.de> <7A86028D-C413-4063-84D8-5AB985EAD2A0@kraus-haus.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Good morning, > Am 28.01.2019 um 03:53 schrieb Paul Kraus <paul@kraus-haus.org>: > (Open)Solaris already had Linux Brand zones, which I’m sure helped get there much faster. > They could already run Linux (user space) in a Zone. Yes, but how did they get there? Is there some technical reason why Linux branded zones are „so far ahead“ of FreeBSD’s Linux ABI that they can run native Docker images while FreeBSD can’t? Or is it just a matter of money and manpower invested? Kind regards, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Kaiserallee 13a Tel.: 0721 9109-0 Fax: -100 76133 Karlsruhe info@punkt.de http://punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gf: Juergen Egelinghelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FE466DD8-8FF9-43B4-8D5E-1AF8FEEE798F>