Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 10:57:02 +0300 From: Gleb Popov <6yearold@gmail.com> To: Andrei <az@azsupport.com> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gfx-next update: drm-4.8-rc2 tagged in drm-next Message-ID: <CALH631kD6qJHbs_ysNjwCfyuzQcz-LLYv1be9h%2BL7RTYnZScsw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20160928092004.3ef54d37@azsupport.com> References: <1569231fc12.1189a20c2251388.8699372849515846410@nextbsd.org> <CAGhTqAXdNBTbdvSzBUFaOMY10jEMy6MehNqN%2BFfdZVpZ5Y1Rbg@mail.gmail.com> <439e20fa-6385-68fb-c97e-24705ebd2f94@nomadlogic.org> <157496f7268.ac5eb5ca278618.8741026532558973404@nextbsd.org> <3FEE7DD3-C408-4398-9F0B-5529B2E7A61F@transactionware.com> <1574b8980bc.106a6e9ef306540.4216158444646545056@nextbsd.org> <20160926192637.33f7921b@azsupport.com> <157683d1ec0.11a09775b76996.945490951353894015@nextbsd.org> <20160927031041.31b6f90a@azsupport.com> <157693fc60a.ebf27bd286215.2625530085502855667@nextbsd.org> <20160927190653.2e21dcaf00756a4c87e9894d@bidouilliste.com> <20160927223030.1a17ec5d@azsupport.com> <57EADB3D.3040800@abinet.ru> <1576d8027dd.b00cc21630114.1196472754988566141@nextbsd.org> <20160927233835.7022dd19@azsupport.com> <201609280434.u8S4YtWv000312@sdf.org> <20160928071200.3a3d26e5@azsupport.com> <CALH631kc7rKxuNriQc1rWH52pzD-aX%2BR3BV=PPv5Ww1VUpbxog@mail.gmail.com> <20160928092004.3ef54d37@azsupport.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Andrei <az@azsupport.com> wrote: > On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:49:43 +0300 > Gleb Popov <6yearold@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The strangest thing is that he does this trolling from his company's > > e-mail, which makes me think the guy is actually hacked. > This is not "company" email. And nobody hacked me. > > > If it is really you, I doubt this would make a good advertisement for > > your services, Andrei. You've been told several times from different > > people that 1. Patches will go into FreeBSD, not some fork. > He is never said that patches will go into FreeBSD. All times he is hiding > from straight answer. He said that this is will be "as port" for "faster > development". This is bullshit. For this he can use CURRENT. > He can, yes, but upstreaming stuff is slow and takes time. It is perfectly fine for a developer to let upstream to pull in his work, instead of doing it himself. > I found that something really wrong when "drm-next 4.6" was finished and > no commits in CURRENT. Then 4.7 and nothing! Even now when 4.8 rc2 and > still you must to download his fork. I will not surprised that "gfx-next" > patches will never be in FreeBSD. > You've found there is something wrong. Great. Now go fix it. Take the burden of upstreaming this code, instead of whining. Maybe you will feel then, what it means to go a full cycle of research a problem -> code it -> upstream it. > > 2. You was the first to mention NextBSD at all. > From: Matthew Macy <mmacy@nextbsd.org> > http://nextbsd.org/welcome-to-ghost/ > and read subject of email "gfx-NEXT update" > > It is so oblivious if you just don't blind. > This post is a year old and doesn't mention any work on DRM field. Nor the github repo in topic. That "NEXT" thing sound somewhat like some conspiracy theory. Illuminaty confirmed? > > Still hoping that this is misunderstanding of yours and you will > > acknowledge it. > I also hopping that you and some others understand me in right way. > If nobody cares, then ok. At least I did something. Bye. > Yeah, bye. Let's not hijack this thread.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALH631kD6qJHbs_ysNjwCfyuzQcz-LLYv1be9h%2BL7RTYnZScsw>