Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 18:01:03 +0100 From: Gerhard Sittig <Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net> To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Failover firewalls with ipfw? Message-ID: <20010122180102.V253@speedy.gsinet> In-Reply-To: <20010122084251.N9165@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>; from peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au on Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 08:42:51AM %2B1100 References: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101191426030.89288-100000@lowrider.lewman.org> <20010122084251.N9165@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 08:42 +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
> As a related issue, has anyone developed code what would allow
> two boxes to share natd map entries? (dummynet is a
> requirement, so suggestions to use IPfilter/IPnat, or similar,
> won't work). This would allow a NAT'd TCP connection to
> fail-over between two boxes.
Although I never did this, the list archive holds repeated
reports on successfully running ipf and ipfw in tandem. So you
can use ipfw for dummynet (and maybe uid / gid stuff?) and ipf
for filtering / translating. See the archive for the sequence
the packets are handed up in. Or UTSL.
virtually yours 82D1 9B9C 01DC 4FB4 D7B4 61BE 3F49 4F77 72DE DA76
Gerhard Sittig true | mail -s "get gpg key" Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net
--
If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above
ask your parents or an adult to help you.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010122180102.V253>