Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Feb 1996 11:26:47 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Cc:        phil@zipmail.co.uk, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: BSDi : Internet Gateway for Novell Networks
Message-ID:  <199602191826.LAA13105@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <18792.824712223@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Feb 18, 96 10:43:43 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > One of these was a system called the BSDi Internet gateway for novell 
> > networks. it sells for $1595 for 5 users and comes with www/ftp etc, 
> > but the bit that caught my attention was the fact that it can be used 
> > for leased-line/dialup routing and (if the article is correct) no 
> > tcp/ip support is needed on the local n/w at all !!
> 
> Yep!  A few people tell me that Novell admins love this since it lets
> them keep their networks "pure" - no icky TCP/IP frames on their
> lovely little IPX networks (and, of course, the clients don't need to
> run TCP/IP stacks).
> 
> I think it would definitely be a well-regarded feature for FreeBSD if
> we supported TCP/IP encapsulation like this.  I don't know how much
> work is involved, but..

I do.  I did a product proposal for this type of thing at Novell.  Even
did some preliminary code.  8-).


The biggest pain is setting up the server engine to advertise itself
and respond to "GetNearestServer()" requests of the apropriate type.

You will need a NetWare developer kit for the client API on the
Windows box.

The largest amount of grunt-work is in writing the Winsock-over-IPX
tunnel.  This is not quite traditional tunneling.

Anyone have a full set of client developer red-boxes?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602191826.LAA13105>