Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 21:51:09 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.commands.mk bsd.licenses.mk bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <1282506669.2664.31.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <20100822110111.GA58812@FreeBSD.org> References: <201008201215.o7KCF2kA004574@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100822110111.GA58812@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
Alexey Dokuchaev píše v ne 22. 08. 2010 v 11:01 +0000:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:15:02PM +0000, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > pav 2010-08-20 12:15:02 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD ports repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > Mk bsd.commands.mk bsd.licenses.mk
> > bsd.port.mk
> > Log:
> > - Provide end-user DISABLE_LICENSES knob to disable licensing framework
> >
> > PR: ports/149070
> > Submitted by: amdmi3
>
> I'm curious what are essential differences between not defining any
> LICENSE and using DISABLE_LICENSES? I understand that it supposedly
> allows to disable license auditing framework completely, but showing the
> case when simply omitting LICENSE != DISABLE_LICENSES would be nice.
It's end-user tunable, not ment to be used in port Makefiles.
--
--
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
An arrow (+0,+0) {@f0} finds a mark. It dies.
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD)
iEYEABECAAYFAkxxf60ACgkQntdYP8FOsoKjyACePNrJyoNH7CcSuUAf9TkhENd5
CrcAoMa1lu7B+Xwx4asN5Xj3ci/0/Dl+
=PMKO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1282506669.2664.31.camel>