Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 19:36:51 +0200 From: Krzysztof Barcikowski <krzysiek@airnet.opole.pl> To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>, Dominic Blais <dblais@interplex.ca>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Default route destination changing without warning follow-up Message-ID: <506DC933.7080307@airnet.opole.pl> In-Reply-To: <20121004160240.GA1967@funkthat.com> References: <2DE61B0869B7484997BCA012845482C7EBE8E280DB@WIN2008.Domnt.abi.ca> <5068AC17.8020704@FreeBSD.org> <2DE61B0869B7484997BCA012845482C7EBE8E280DC@WIN2008.Domnt.abi.ca> <5068ADCC.5030105@FreeBSD.org> <2DE61B0869B7484997BCA012845482C7EBE8E280DD@WIN2008.Domnt.abi.ca> <5068B48E.2070303@FreeBSD.org> <20121004160240.GA1967@funkthat.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
W dniu 2012-10-04 18:02, John-Mark Gurney pisze: > Alexander V. Chernikov wrote this message on Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 01:07 +0400: >> On 01.10.2012 00:59, Dominic Blais wrote: >>> It's all about IPv4 in my case. >> It will be great to supply some more details (e.g. like FreeBSD version, >> interfaces configuration, netstat -rn output). >> >> How often does this happen ? >> (e.g. while true; do echo -n `date` ; route -n get default | grep gate; >> sleep 1; done can help) >> >> If this is reproducible, what actions precedes this change? >> Maybe some ARP traffic on that interface, or interface >> creation/deletion, or.. ? >> >> Is route monitor completely silent when the change happens? > Just for refernece, Dominic brought this up in an earlier thread: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2DE61B0869B7484997BCA012845482C7EBE62DDD88@WIN2008.Domnt.abi.ca > > and at least on other person seems to have the same issue... > > quick question for you Dominic, do you see the correct number of routes, > but a new wrong one appear? or does the route just simply disapear? or > does a new one seem to replace the old one? > > The reason I ask is that if a new wrong one appears, it could be memory > corruption, but if a new one replaces the old one, for some reason when > allocating a new route, it could accidentatlly be replacing the default > route... > > Just some thoughts... > Hi, I don't see a second new route appearing in my case, just the default or static route is replaced. I'm not conviced of memory corruption, as it happens on 3 different physical machines. Best regards! Krzysiek Barcikowski
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?506DC933.7080307>