Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 20:09:06 +0000 From: Stephen Jones <StephenJo@LivingComputerMuseum.org> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=27Roger_Pau_Monn=E9=27?= <roger.pau@citrix.com> Cc: "'freebsd-xen@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: xn ethernet issues as DOMU under NetBSD DOM0 Message-ID: <C4D720DD281F6740AC917B82741E9AD2AB27C2AA@505MBX1.corp.vnw.com> In-Reply-To: <20160503093211.hkmbbqr6t2fbxqqa@mac> References: <C4D720DD281F6740AC917B82741E9AD2AB27BC39@505MBX1.corp.vnw.com> <20160503072441.qgqgaw52sijybg4a@mac> <C4D720DD281F6740AC917B82741E9AD2AB27C045@505MBX1.corp.vnw.com> <20160503093211.hkmbbqr6t2fbxqqa@mac>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > >Can you try with a HEAD snapshot? netfront has been recently reworked = [0], so there's a chance it is already fixed there. > > > > > >Roger. > >=20 > > Okay, I just grabbed an iso out of:=20 > > /pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/ISO-IMAGES/10.3 and did a fresh install on a dom= u, but had the same result. The ISO was time stamped April 30th, did I use= the right one? >=20 > Oh, no, the changes weren't backported to 10. You need to use a 11.0 (HEA= D) image, just pick the newer amd64 or i386 one from: >=20 > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/ISO-IMAGES/11.0/ >=20 > Roger. Thank you for that clarification. OK, I've used 11.0 and did a fresh insta= ll, but I'm still having the same issue. I should clarify that the net ins= talls using=20 the same virtual ethernet interface (maybe not the same netfront?) works gr= eat for both 10.3 and 11.0 installs. What is the difference between the installation kernel and the installed system xn driver? =20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C4D720DD281F6740AC917B82741E9AD2AB27C2AA>