Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 14:17:39 -0400 From: Scott Lambert <lambert@lambertfam.org> To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Re[2]: About the openssl hole Message-ID: <20020730181739.GA50219@laptop.lambertfam.org> In-Reply-To: <Luv18a019e@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> References: <004001c237cf$23c00560$fa00a8c0@elixor> <170112657687.20020730181657@buz.ch> <000d01c237e5$ceede1d0$fa00a8c0@elixor> <5113861671.20020730183701@buz.ch> <002301c237ea$04b4d4f0$fa00a8c0@elixor> <Luv18a019e@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 07:52:54PM +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote: > Geir RÜness wrote: > > > But as many know, the port of openssl will > > not completly replace the core open ssl. > > (You could see this if you build mod_ssl) > > apache13-modssl will see and use an installed > port of openssl in /usr/local But if you install the openssl port with -DOPENSSL_OVERWRITE_BASE, the ports should simply see the "base" install of openssl and use it that way, no? Do openssl using programs need to be recompiled for library changes between OpenSSL 0.9.6a and OpenSSL 0.9.6d? ssh, sendmail, postfix, stunnel, various pop3 and imap daemons, apache, ....? -- Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin lambert@lambertfam.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020730181739.GA50219>