Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 23:52:18 +0400 From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc completeness Message-ID: <20120528195218.GA85856@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <4FC34059.9070702@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120527140541.GL2987@hades.panopticon> <4FC34059.9070702@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Doug Barton (dougb@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > > I'm running a little pet project of improving completeness of > > tools/build/mk/OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc file and thus delete-old* > > targets with regard to all possible WITHOUT_* knobs. > > > > E.g. when WITHOUT_foo is defined in src.conf, make delete-old should > > remove related files completely, to make a system look exactly like > > it's world was installed with that knob set. > > > > First of all, an automatic script to check for leftovers after > > delete-old for all possible knobs is available from [2]. Feel free > > to run in on different architectures and FreeBSD branches; I'm > > currently running it on amd64. I also think that it should be run > > during preparation of each FreeBSD release. > > > > There are some questions I'd like to discuss. > > > > 1) named config file var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf was intentionally > > left out from OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc, so I did the same for other > > configs which may be changed by users. > > That's one reason to omit it. Another is that the bind ports use the > same set of config files. But putting in under OLD_CONFIGS+= would still be ok? -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120528195218.GA85856>