Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 16:43:55 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: removing src/usr.bin/doscmd ... Message-ID: <20040325004355.GB40061@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <4061EC4D.9020504@freebsd.org> References: <200403232227.i2NMRQn5042762@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040324164155.GA4737@dragon.nuxi.com> <xzpsmfyavdn.fsf@dwp.des.no> <p06020469bc879a686d10@[128.113.24.47]> <4061EC4D.9020504@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 01:15:09PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > Garance A Drosihn wrote: > >>"David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> writes: > >> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > >> > > Log: > >> > > Remove doscmd from the base system now that it lives in > >> > > the ports tree. > >> > > >> > Did you *really* have consensus for this? > >> > >>Yes. > > > >That was not my impression. I had thought that it was going to > >stay until 6.0. (not that I care much either way, I'm just saying ... > To be fair, there are other packages in /usr/port/emulators that are > significantly better than doscmd. However, I'm open to putting doscmd > into the disc1 package set for releases if that would help people feel > better. No, that is not the issue. The issue is DES using an axe w/o consensus. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040325004355.GB40061>