Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:35:45 +0100 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf options src/sys/dev/dpt dpt.h dpt_eisa.c dpt_scsi.c src/sys/dev/si si.c Message-ID: <20070119083545.GF83925@alchemy.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <20070118.175218.-1641055210.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <200701181333.l0IDXbwd098155@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070118.175218.-1641055210.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 05:52:18PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <200701181333.l0IDXbwd098155@repoman.freebsd.org>
> Marius Strobl <marius@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> : marius 2007-01-18 13:33:36 UTC
> :
> : FreeBSD src repository
> :
> : Modified files:
> : sys/conf options
> : sys/dev/dpt dpt.h dpt_eisa.c dpt_scsi.c
> : sys/dev/si si.c
> : Log:
> : Wrap the EISA-specific parts of the dpt(4) and si(4) back-ends in
> : the newly added DEV_EISA. This is done so that these back-ends can
> : be compiled on platforms not providing in{b,w,l}()/out{b,w,l}() and
> : friends (but may wish to use them together with bus front-ends other
> : than the EISA one).
>
> Why is dpt_eisa.c even included when EISA isn't included in the
> kernel?
>
Uhm, it isn't. I just touched it to add a #include "opt_eisa.h",
as I had added a #ifdef DEV_EISA around dpt_pio_get_conf() in
dpt.h.
Marius
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070119083545.GF83925>