Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:41:30 -0500 From: "Will Saxon" <WillS@housing.ufl.edu> To: <eberkut@minithins.net>, "Jacob S. Barrett" <jbarrett@amduat.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Solution for Resilient VLAN Trunk Bonding Message-ID: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED802E867D7@bragi.housing.ufl.edu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: eberkut [mailto:eberkut@minithins.net] > Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 3:57 PM > To: Jacob S. Barrett > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Solution for Resilient VLAN Trunk Bonding >=20 >=20 > > I would have liked to have used either ng_fec or=20 > ng_one2many, but neither > > of them detects link failures. >=20 > According to the original ng_fec announcement [1] on=20 > freebsd-net, ng_fec > should be able to detect link failure by checking the=20 > interfaces in the > bundle once every second. >=20 > Even though I don't "speak" C fluently, I think ng_fec_tick=20 > in ng_fec.c > [2] should do the trick. >=20 > [1] > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=3D448009+0+archive/ > 2001/freebsd-net/20010211.freebsd-net > [2] http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/netgraph/ng_fec.c Regardless, it doesn't look like ng_fec can work with ng_vlan, since it doesn't provide any hooks to work with. -Will
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED802E867D7>