Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 14:11:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Ralph Huntington <rjh@mohawk.net> To: <peter.lai@uconn.edu> Cc: <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: security upgrade question Message-ID: <20020808140643.O75214-100000@mohegan.mohawk.net> In-Reply-To: <20020808172357.GA16252@cowbert.2y.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thank you, Peter... > > ... have the libc problem and the openssl problem and > > the bind problem and whatever else problem been > > taken care of in RELENG_4 ?? > > No. RELENG_4 is -STABLE, which is always newer than RELENG_4_6. So, if RELENG_4 is always newer than RELENG_4_6 and RELENG_4_6 has been patched for the problems mentioned above, wouldn't RELENG_4 either be patched or have newer versions of the programs? In other words, if RELENG_4 is the STABLE version leading to the next point RELEASE, wouldn't it have the security problems taken care of already? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020808140643.O75214-100000>