Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:28:30 -0500 From: Don Bowman <don@sandvine.com> To: 'Petri Helenius' <pete@he.iki.fi>, Don Bowman <don@sandvine.com> Cc: "'freebsd-net@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: ng_fec hash mechanism versus cisco etherchannel Message-ID: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C8533701022DFC@mail.sandvine.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: Petri Helenius [mailto:pete@he.iki.fi] > It does not matter if you send using the other link as long > as you send > all packets > for the same stream over the same link to avoid reordering. > So yes, it does > interoperate. can you end up with a link flap? e.g. the catalyst does SA learning to pick the port, so it sends it out port 1. We respond via port 2 since we use the SIP^DIP. The catalyst switches that through to the other end, which replies, and comes back via port 1. I guess this isn't tragic. --don (don@sandvine.com www.sandvine.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C8533701022DFC>