Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 22:46:15 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: =?koi8-r?Q?S=F8ren?= Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/nfs nfs_lock.c Message-ID: <20010823224615.B571@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20010823223936.A571@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200108231802.f7NI2TJ22312@freefall.freebsd.org> <200108231822.f7NIMQ668039@freebsd.dk> <20010823223936.A571@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 22:39:37 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > Only two 'oops' today. All other for implementing just different parts we > don't even have before (EOVERFLOW, l_len<0), cosmetique, spelling, etc. I > prefer small portions over mega-commits with several features at once. > My local tests works, but it is difficult to test full implications of > overflow handling, some fixes come from the people feedback (which I don't > have when post CFR into arch@) Moreover, smbfs & nfs portions of adv. locking check was broken even in our old variant, so I forced to deal with bugs which are not mine, because I see that simple adding my new features as elsewhere is not enough for that code. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010823224615.B571>