Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 22:06:32 -0400 From: Leo Papandreou <leo@talcom.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Q] How stable is FreeBSD 3.X ? Message-ID: <19990525220632.A22788@homer.talcom.net> In-Reply-To: <000001bea677$bc99d5f0$021d85d1@whenever.youwant.to>; from David Schwartz on Mon, May 24, 1999 at 11:28:00PM -0700 References: <199905250611.XAA00594@dingo.cdrom.com> <000001bea677$bc99d5f0$021d85d1@whenever.youwant.to>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 11:28:00PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote: > > Speaking from a developer's viewpoint; if a complaint from any quarter > > doesn't contain the bare minimum of real information needed to identify > > the problem (or at least problem class) it's worthless. In fact, it's > > worse than worthless, it's an active waste of my time even thinking > > about it. > > That I do disagree with. The complaint was precise -- the RELEASE was not > stable. > Then you'll agree with this: 3-R is/was stable as a rock on my hardware. Why wasnt it released earlier? > While it did not contain enough information to solve the problem, there are > certainly possible solutions to it That makes sense. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990525220632.A22788>