Date: 21 Feb 2000 01:05:31 +0100 From: naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openssl in -current Message-ID: <88pvgb$26o5$1@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de> References: <1D45ABC754FB1E4888E508992CE97E4F059CE6@teknos.teknos.com> <3.0.3.32.20000220170538.009084b0@207.227.119.2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeffrey J. Mountin <jeff-ml@mountin.net> wrote: > My big question is - Do we really want to force a 'make world' on the those > that want RSA support in openssl? We don't want to and WE DON'T DO. > That would be ugly, when before it was simply the matter of building only > two ports. binary installation: - before: user needs to install openssl port - now: user needs to install openssl package make world: - before: user needs to install openssl port - now: openssl is built as part of the world This thread suffers from people yelling objection without even understanding the situation. There are a few teething problems which are blown up way out of proportion: - Some people outside the US get their crypto source from a US mirror. They shouldn't do this in the first place. In the presence of USA_RESIDENT=NO, OpenSSL than proceeds to build without RSA. - Apparently, there currently is a bug where bsd.port.mk fails to recognize that the RSA-enabled package hasn't been installed. I'm sure this can easily be fixed, but tying up Kris in endless discussions here won't accelerate the process. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?88pvgb$26o5$1>