Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 11:46:15 +0300 From: Alexey Zelkin <phantom@FreeBSD.org.ua> To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/releases Makefile www/en/releases/2.0 Makefile www/en/releases/2.0.5R Makefile www/en/releases/2.1.5R Makefile www/en/releases/2.1.6R Makefile www/en/releases/2.1.7R Makefile www/en/releases/2.1R Makefile www/en/releases/2.2.2R Makefile ... Message-ID: <20040407084615.GB35059@phantom.cris.net> In-Reply-To: <20040406182015.GA796@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <200404061132.i36BWTWa015996@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040406182015.GA796@zaphod.nitro.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 08:20:16PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2004.04.06 04:32:29 -0700, Alexey Zelkin wrote: > > phantom 2004/04/06 04:32:29 PDT > > > > FreeBSD doc repository > > > > Modified files: > > en/releases Makefile > [CUT] > > Log: > > Bring these Makefiles into same style of declarations. Also sort > > DOCS/DATA entries. > > Hmm, I think we should try to have the same style as the src/ tree like > the example below. It's not something I feel very strongly about, it > just seems silly to have a different style in doc/ for no apparent > reason. 1. doc/ and src/ are different repositories 2. doc/ and src/ have different content (and different style of content representation) 3. filenames in doc/ much longer in average case then filenames in src/ 4. I based on style which is mostly used across doc/ and www/ Makefiles > BTW. when I'm writing to you anyway, thanks for the events/ fixes. You are welcome ;-) -- /* Alexey Zelkin && Independent Contractor */ /* phantom(at)FreeBSD.org && http://www.FreeBSD.org/java */ /* phantom(at)cris.net && http://www.FreeBSD.org.ua/ */
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040407084615.GB35059>