Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 18:48:08 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox <v.velox@vvelox.net> To: mcarugno@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: and the winner is... Message-ID: <20050901184808.3e096403@vixen42.vulpes> In-Reply-To: <2792860b05090114194d4df30a@mail.gmail.com> References: <2792860b05090114194d4df30a@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005 18:19:15 -0300 Mario Carugno <mcarugno@gmail.com> wrote: > I there, i was trying freebsd for a while, and comparing it against > debian/linux. > The winner was Debian by far... Freebsd could be stable, but it is > not faster... and Debian is far much more 'usable'. > Freebsd package installation is very laborious compared with > Debian's apt system. I have to search in each CD, know > dependences,... X configuration is hard too when the autodetected > configuration doesn't works... > I think fbsd is good, but needs some user facilities. I am bored, so I bite ^_^ Use pkg_add -r. Make cvsup and portupgrade the first installed, use them. I only ever grab the boot only CD. The autodetected one does not work? Odd, out side of crappy hardware I've not seen this before. X -configure has all ways worked nicely for me except for one system with a weird video chip. As far as speed goes, I've honestly have never had a problem with it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050901184808.3e096403>