Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 14:26:34 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 218164] lang/gcc5: Bootstrap comparison failure Message-ID: <bug-218164-29464-QJ04TI0X4p@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-218164-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-218164-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D218164 Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|gerald@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.o | |rg Flags|maintainer-feedback?(gerald | |@FreeBSD.org) | --- Comment #3 from Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Micha=C5=82 "phoe" Herda from comment #2) > I can build both gcc5 and gcc48 as long as I do not select bootstrapping= =20 > in config. If anything, it's actually supposed to be the other way around, boostrapping should be the safer option. The error you see is GCC compiling itself repeatedly does not lead to a consistent result as it should. Clearly this does not happen for other SPARC targets of GCC, and I'm afraid I won't be able to help with this. (Luckily there is at least a workaround of disabling bootstrap, which is the default for lang/gcc.) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-218164-29464-QJ04TI0X4p>