Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:22:14 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Lock annotations: enable them for libpthread, libstdthreads Message-ID: <CAJ-VmonLvRfnrm2DNki24WP5hUAReXao_=jwgWWCObCjhajn5w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJOYFBAo6KOuWuXcduA8DJZxNg7W8bAhM5ydGAhPKCdLMjWsvQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJOYFBBbzu9ouwfUk1%2B1MLW0B2y%2B5JTD9-b0%2BkiymOT=xKU0uQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140828171859.GA81757@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CAJOYFBAo6KOuWuXcduA8DJZxNg7W8bAhM5ydGAhPKCdLMjWsvQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 August 2014 10:34, Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> wrote: > On 28 August 2014 19:18, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: >> What it is the performance penalty (time and memory)? That is, >> buildworld already takes a looooonnnnng time on my system because >> of clang. > > My gut feeling is that impact is minimal. Buildworlds seem to take > approximately the same time, mainly because we don't have that many > annotated objects/functions/expressions. I will do some measurements. Would you please test on something that isn't the latest generation hardware? Even just a core 2 duo would be fine. -a
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmonLvRfnrm2DNki24WP5hUAReXao_=jwgWWCObCjhajn5w>