Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 20:39:21 +0200 From: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de> To: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (Andrey A. Chernov) <ache@nagual.ru> Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-gnu@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/man/man Makefile man.c Message-ID: <199606221839.UAA07135@campa.panke.de> In-Reply-To: <199606221555.TAA02217@nagual.ru> References: <199606221143.NAA00457@campa.panke.de> <199606221555.TAA02217@nagual.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
KOI8-R writes: >> I thought the general consensus was a sgid man, not suid. > >I don't see how sgid man can be better than suid man now, Security, security, security. Principle of least privilege. >but I see >that sgid man requires additional changes in the permissions >and man utils. minor changes. >I don't hear that it is general consensus too. Look into the mailing list archive. Wolfram
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606221839.UAA07135>