Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:05:30 -0500 (CDT) From: erik@math.smsu.edu (Erik Greenwald) To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: sysconf() vs sysctl() Message-ID: <20010827200530.666928E451@math.smsu.edu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi
Are there any plans to implement'_SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF' in sysconf() ? I'm
aware of hw.ncpu and the sysctl() call with {CTL_HW,HW_NCPU}, but sysconf is
posix and sysctl is not :) (is it already done in 5.0? I'm using 4.4)
thnx
-Erik <erik@smluc.org> [http://math.smsu.edu/~erik]
The opinions expressed by me are not necessarily opinions. In all probability,
they are random rambling, and to be ignored. Failure to ignore may result in
severe boredom or confusion. Shake well before opening. Keep Refrigerated.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010827200530.666928E451>