Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:37:52 -0400
From:      Diane Bruce <db@db.net>
To:        David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
Cc:        tedm@toybox.placo.com
Subject:   Re: GPL vs BSD Licence
Message-ID:  <20041029163752.GA62159@night.dbn>
In-Reply-To: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKGEGBPGAA.davids@webmaster.com>
References:  <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNCEJBEPAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKGEGBPGAA.davids@webmaster.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 09:24:55AM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
>
> > The GPL and Linux don't care if you link into their system libraries,
> > they expect that which is why the system libraries are LGPLd
...
> 	If I write a piece of code that uses a defined interface, it's utterly
> preposterous to argue that it is derivative from an *implementation* of that
> interface, since it could be used with *any* implementation of that
> interface.

I suppose, one *could* have the situation where someone does a "clean room"
set of new include files derived from GPL ones. (This has happened already btw)
and have the DCMA used against this derivation. (I suppose. I am not a lawyer.)

- Diane



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041029163752.GA62159>